Legal Opinion

Harris v. Hanson

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 15, 1834PublishedCited by 10 opinions

This was an action of debt on the bond given by Hanson and the other defendants as his sureties, to the plaintiff, as Treasurer of the State, for the faithful performance of the duties of Coroner. It was submitted for the decision of the Court upon a case stated — the material facts being as follows: One Peter Frost, who was a deputy sheriff, sued out his writ against one John Maddox, and committed the same to Hanson, the defendant, for service.

Read the full summary

This was an action of debt on the bond given by Hanson and the other defendants as his sureties, to the plaintiff, as Treasurer of the State, for the faithful performance of the duties of Coroner. It was submitted for the decision of the Court upon a case stated — the material facts being as follows: One Peter Frost, who was a deputy sheriff, sued out his writ against one John Maddox, and committed the same to Hanson, the defendant, for service. On which, by direction of the creditor, Hanson attached a wagon as the property of Maddox — but one Sumner Knight, claiming to own the wagon, took…

1Opinion of the Court

Parris J.

delivered the opinion of the Court.

By statute chap. 91, sec. 5, it is provided, that all Coroners, who shall be appointed in any county in this State, before proceeding to discharge the duties of their office, shall give unto the Treasurer of the State a bond with sufficient sureties, for the faithful performance of the duties of their said office.

The condition of the bond, in this case, is, that the said Han~ son shall well and faithfully do and perform all the duties which he is, by lawr, bound to do and perform by virtue of his holding said office. Although the condition is not in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grinnell v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1805
  2. Supervisors of Allegany v. Van CampenNew York Supreme Court · 1829

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gates v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  2. Van Pelt v. LittlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. State ex rel. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad v. ShacklettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
  4. Warren v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  5. City of Scottsbluff v. Southern Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API