Helvering v. Fried
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
Respondents in these two causes were partners as Albert Fried & Company, brokers, member of the New York Stock Exchange, with offices at 120 Broadway. When he undertook to determine their individual taxable profits during 1931, the Commissioner denied their claim that the firm’s operations on the Exchange as a “Specialist” in thirteen stocks gave it the status of dealer therein, entitled to the privilege of inventorying such securities for tax purposes at market value under Article 105, Treasury Regulations 74, Revenue Act 1928.
Upon stipulated facts the Board of Tax Appeals, although sharply…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Kemon v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
- Stephens, Inc., and Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Securities Allied Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- Leach Corp. v. BlacklidgeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1938
- Williamson v. BowersDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.