Legal Opinion

Sanson v. Gonzales

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1984No. 17514-PRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Justice.

We granted the petition for review in the case at bench because, inter alia, of our disagreement with certain conclusions reached by the court of appeals and a conflict between the opinion of the court of appeals (Sanson v. Gonzales, 142 Ariz. 30, 688 P.2d 676 [App.1984]) and that of Division 2 of the same court in the case of First Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Ram, 135 Ariz. 178, 659 P.2d 1323 (1982).

We are advised by counsel that the parties have entered into a settlement agreement. Concluding, therefore, that the issues raised in the petition for review and response…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. RamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  2. Sanson v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Phillips v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Miller v. UhrickCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  3. Dorn v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  4. Miller v. UhrickArizona Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API