Legal Opinion

In Re Washington Mutual, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware

Decided June 1, 2011No. 16-12357PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION 1

MARY F. WALRATH, Bankruptcy Judge.

Before the Court is the question of who is entitled to assets held in trusts created in connection with deferred employee compensation plans established by the predecessor to Washington Mutual, Inc. (“WMI”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court holds that WMI is the owner and entitled to all the funds in the trusts.

I. BACKGROUND

WMI was a savings and loan holding company, which had acquired, inter alia, Home Savings of America, FSB (“Home Savings”) the successor to H.F. Ahmanson & Company (“Ahmanson”). Certain employees of Home Savings and/or…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hill v. Opus Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
  2. Halperin v. MorenoDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2019
  3. Perkins v. PM Realty Group, L.P.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2024
  4. The Lehman Brothers Inc. Deferred Compensation Def v. GiddensUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API