Legal Opinion

Salamon v. Charney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 17, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered July 14, 1999, which denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

This second action to recover a broker’s fee was commenced after the six-year limitations period had run and after the January 1, 1998 effective date of current CPLR 306-b. CPLR former 306-b (b) related this action back to the timely commencement of a prior action to recover such fee that was dismissed for lack of proper service after January 1, 1998 and after the limitations period had run. We note…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Zaleski v. MlynarkiewiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Earle v. ValenteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Leader v. Maroney, Ponzini & SpencerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Citron v. SchlossbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Murphy v. HoppensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API