Legal Opinion

In Re the Last Will & Testament of Hall

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 27, 1995No. 2324PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Connor, Judge:

In this probate matter, Sarah Hall Hayes and her children appeal a circuit court order affirming the probate court’s (1) characterizing the remainder interest Hayes’ children received under the will of her mother, Mary Lightsey Hall, as contingent, and (2) declaring Hayes’ attempt to disclaim her interest in the devised estate invalid. We affirm.

Mary Lightsey Hall (the Testatrix) died testate April 4, 1992. Her children, Mary Hall McCallum, Wilton E. Hall, Jr., Perry D. Hall, and Sarah Hall Hayes, survived her. Item III of the Testatrix’s will provides as follows:

5. I give and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roundtree v. RoundtreeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
  2. Dean v. KilgoreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Miller v. RogersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  4. Pate v. FordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HoldenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. McGirt v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Strickland v. Bowater, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  4. South Carolina Department of Social Services v. PritcherCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API