Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Booth Creek Ski Group, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 20, 2001No. 98-560PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.

The plaintiffs, Andrew S. Kaplan and James F. Miles, shareholders of Loon Mountain Recreation Corporation, Inc., (Loon), sought to prevent the acquisition of Loon by the defendants, Booth Creek Ski Group (Booth Creek) and its subsidiary, LMRC Acquisition Corporation, until the defendants complied with the requirements of RSA chapter 421-A (1987), the Security Takeover Disclosure Act (Takeover Act). The plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Superior Court (Lynn, J.) dismissing their equity action on the basis that the Takeover Act does not apply to the merger between Loon and Booth Creek. We…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Zirn v. VLI Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  2. Silva v. BotschSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  3. Snow v. American Morgan Horse Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  4. Proctor v. Bank of New Hampshire, N.A.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  5. Sheffield v. Consolidated Foods Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crowley v. FrazierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  2. Hawkins v. New Hampshire Department of Health & Human ResourcesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  3. In re Baby Girl P.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API