The PEOPLE v. Peck
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer
The question in this case is the sufficiency of an indictment for burglary which charges the unlawful entry of a specified building “with intent to commit therein a theft,” but does not name the person whose property the defendant intended to steal.
The indictment alleged that on January 16, 1963, the defendant, Michael Wayne Peck, “committed the offense of Burglary, in that he, without authority, knowingly entered into a building of Frank Sarnecki, doing business as Frank Sarnecki Eneo Service Station, with intent to commit therein a theft * * The defendant moved to quash the indictment, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The PEOPLE v. StewartIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
- The PEOPLE v. FiggersIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. PicardIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
- The People v. WeissIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
- The PEOPLE v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- People v. CabreraIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. ManningIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- The People v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
- The People v. WhittakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. RothermelIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.