Martin v. Curtis
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Grand Traverse; Corbett, J. Assumpsit by Clarence I. Martin against Ashley B. Curtis for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment for defendant, .plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The appellant brought assumpsit, and the brief of his counsel states that the case depended upon an item of offset, amounting to $116, which was credited to the defendant by the jury. . It arose as follows: The plaintiff was the assignee of the account against the *170defendant, from plaintiff’s father. The charge, which is the only means we have of determining the facts, as no evidence is printed in the record, shows that Martin, Sr., owned a sawmill, which one Hudson operated on his own account, and that Hudson’s men boarded at the defendant’s hotel, upon his credit, whereby Hudson became…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mulcrone v. American Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harrington-Wiard Co. v. Blomstrom Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Martin v. Leeper Bros. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915