Huntt v. Commonwealth

Robert Bruce Huntt (defendant or Huntt) was convicted by a jury in the trial court of grant larceny by check, a violation of Code § 6.1-115. He was sentenced to serve four months in jail and to pay a fine of $500 in accordance with the jury’s verdict.

This appeal turns on whether the evidence is sufficient to support that verdict. The defendant argues that the evidence is insufficient in many respects. We need consider only two, namely, (1) the evidence fails to establish that the check was made with knowledge of insufficient funds, and (2) the evidence fails to show the requisite intent to…