Legal Opinion

West v. Chafee

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 11, 1976No. 2-74-Civ-191PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DEVITT, Chief Judge.

The question presented by this habeas corpus petition is whether or not petitioner, a doctor, should be released from his naval active duty obligation incurred in exchange for a draft deferment which enabled him to complete his medical school and residency requirements. Dr. West accepted the service obligation under the provisions of the so-called “Berry Plan” in January 1971. He was given a reserve commission, granted a draft deferment valid until completion of his family practice residency, and placed on “inactive status.” He received no monetary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Strait v. LairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. Harold M. Ekberg and Secrie EkbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  4. Donald S. Roth v. Melvin Laird, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  5. James E. Appelwick, M.D. v. Martin R. Hoffman, Secretary of the Army and Linden E. Schuyler, Adjutant GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. William P. West, M.D. v. John H. Chafee, Secretary of the Navy, and Captain S. J. BarcayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API