Legal Opinion
Drozdowski v. Washington Center for Addictions
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided December 27, 1974Published
1Opinion of the Court
The order denying the petition to vacate judgment must be affirmed for the reasons stated in Mergupis v. Hackett, *908331 Mass. 759 (1954). See also Sessler v. O’Donnell, 346 Mass. 778 (1964).
Stanley Drozdowski, pro se. David M. Upton for the defendant.
Order denying petition affirmed.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mergupis v. HackettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
- Sessler v. O'DonnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964