Legal Opinion

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Joe's Stone Crab, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided August 12, 1998No. 93-1082-CIVPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MONETARY DAMAGES & INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

HURLEY, District Judge.

At the conclusion of the liability phase of this case, the court found Joe’s Stone Crab, Inc. (Joe’s or “the restaurant”) guilty of sex discrimination. See EEOC v. Joe’s Stone Crab, Inc., 969 F.Supp. 727 (S.D.Fla.1997). This finding was based on an examination of Joe’s employment practices which showed that management delegated total hiring authority to subordinates who, without the benefit of policies 1 or guidelines, used subjective criteria to select only males for food server positions. One high-ranking…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Eshelman v. Agere Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. Chuong Van Pham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Chuong Van Pham v. Seattle City LightWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Blaney v. International Ass'n of MacHinistsWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Blaney v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace WorkersWashington Supreme Court · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API