Legal Opinion

McJunkin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1991No. A90A1608PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

Defendant was convicted of possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, OCGA § 16-13-30 (b), and driving under the influence of alcohol, OCGA § 40-6-391. His two enumerations of error complain of the ineffectiveness of his trial counsel.

On appeal defendant is represented by new counsel who filed his notice of appeal 19 days after entry of judgment against him, but did not file a motion for new trial. For this reason, the question of whether his trial counsel was ineffective was not presented to the trial court. Where such error was not asserted in the trial…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ponder v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  3. Simpson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  4. Weems v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kinney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  2. King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  3. King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. Kinney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  5. Kinney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API