Legal Opinion

Pahaham v. Danbury Police Department

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided October 15, 1997No. 5:92 CV 0073 (GLG)Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION ON MOTION TO INTERVENE AND FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

GOETTEL, District Judge.

The hiring of fifteen new police officers by the City of Danbury since April, 1996, and the anticipated hiring of ten to thirteen additional officers, has prompted the recent activity in this case, which had been settled by a consent order nearly three years ago. Seven individuals and the Danbury Guardians Association, Inc., have moved to intervene in this action claiming that the consent order eonfers upon them a right which cannot be protected adequately…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Firefighters Local Union No. 1784 v. StottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Edwards v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. Able v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. Berger v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API