Legal Opinion

United States v. Brevard

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided March 5, 2003No. 03-6002/ARPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge EFFRON

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Charges against Appellant have been referred to two separate coürts-martial. The first court-martial, which has been abated, involves charges that Appellant committed a variety of offenses against persons, property, and military authority. The second court-martial, which is the subject of the present appeal, involves a separate charge of fraudulent separation, in violation of Article 83, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. § 883 (2002). The military judge at Appellant’s second court-martial dismissed the charge of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  2. United States v. MelansonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  3. United States v. ReidCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  4. United States v. BrevardArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. SHANNONU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013
  2. United States v. ShannonU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API