Legal Opinion

Harkrader v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1990No. 28A01-9001-CR-17PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

Appellant-defendant Bill Harkrader appeals his conviction of dealing in a controlled substance, a Class B felony.

We affirm.

Harkrader raises these three issues: 1) whether the State failed to establish the corpus delicti for the offense of dealing; 2) whether there was sufficient evidence establishing venue; and 3) whether the State established when the offense occurred. •

Corpus Delicti

Harkrader maintains that the State’s evidence, independent of his confession, did not establish that a delivery had occurred, an element of the charged offense. Although Harkrader does not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Fleener v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Floyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Duling v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Andy A. Shinnock v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Simmons v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Scott v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Christopher Allen Peacock v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API