Harkrader v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Judge.
Appellant-defendant Bill Harkrader appeals his conviction of dealing in a controlled substance, a Class B felony.
We affirm.
Harkrader raises these three issues: 1) whether the State failed to establish the corpus delicti for the offense of dealing; 2) whether there was sufficient evidence establishing venue; and 3) whether the State established when the offense occurred. •
Corpus Delicti
Harkrader maintains that the State’s evidence, independent of his confession, did not establish that a delivery had occurred, an element of the charged offense. Although Harkrader does not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Grey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
- Fleener v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Floyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
- Duling v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sweeney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Andy A. Shinnock v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
- Simmons v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Scott v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Christopher Allen Peacock v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.