Rykard v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Purdy, J., Greenwood, April, 1907. Action by L. H. Rykard against Seaboard Air Line Railway. Prom order on Circuit affirming judgment of magistrate, W. G. Austin, defendant appeals. Mr. Glenn cites: A non-resident may be garnished in Georgia: 57 S. E., 104. The garnishment proceedings in Georgia are binding on plaintiff: 198 U. S., 215; 200 U. S-., 176. Messrs.
Read the full summary
Before Purdy, J., Greenwood, April, 1907. Action by L. H. Rykard against Seaboard Air Line Railway. Prom order on Circuit affirming judgment of magistrate, W. G. Austin, defendant appeals. Mr. Glenn cites: A non-resident may be garnished in Georgia: 57 S. E., 104. The garnishment proceedings in Georgia are binding on plaintiff: 198 U. S., 215; 200 U. S-., 176. Messrs. Grier and Park cite: This case is controlled by Brwirís case: 71 S. C., 229. The record does not show the Atlanta Court acquired jurisdiction of garnishee: Code of Ga., Secs. 4710, 4726, 4974, 4975, 4732; 90 Ga., 42; 94 Ga,,…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chiee Justice Pope.
This action was- commenced in the court of magistrate Austin, Greenwood County, State of South Carolina, on the 18th day of July, 1906. The defendant was served with summons and written complaint. The summons and complaint demanded judgment for $80.00. The action was for two months’ wages (May and June, 190-6), due the plaintiff by the defendant, at the rate of forty dollars per month. The defendant appeared and pleaded orally to the written complaint of the plaintiff. The magistrate took down the answer made by the defendant,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Erwin v. Southern RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mitchum v. BarksdaleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922