Brown v. Caldwell
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Gunter, Justice.
In this habeas corpus case the applicant, an inmate of the Department of Corrections, did not attack the sentence that he is serving but attacked the treatment and discipline that has been accorded to him as an inmate of the Department of Corrections. The habeas corpus court remanded the appellant to custody, and he has come to this court seeking review.
Under Georgia’s habeas corpus statutes an application for the writ is not the proper procedure for attacking the treatment, the discipline, or the conditions of confinement being imposed upon an inmate by the department.
Code…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Marshall v. KortSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Hill v. OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- Heard v. HopperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Forbes v. RickettsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Lewis v. GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.