Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Peterson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 27, 1967No. 39,894PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pep Curiam.
Relptor was convicted of contempt by the District Court of Hennepin Coupty OP March 19, 1965. The contempt was both constructive and criminal in nature. Because relator was not afforded a jury trial and the proceedings do not conform to the procedures required by our decision in Peterson *433v. Peterson, 278 Minn. 275, 153 N. W. (2d) 825, his convictioh Must be reversed and a new trial granted.
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Peterson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
3Cited by3 opinions
- Palmer A. Peterson v. Faye v. Peterson, Robert W. Dygert and James P. RorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Petterson v. BartelsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- In Re Discipline of DrexlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971