Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Walrus Manufacturing Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided May 24, 1960No. Civ. A. 2710PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POOS, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings suit against defendant to recover on a performance bond issued by it in Pennsylvania to United Construction Company. The United Construction Company is not a party to this proceeding. It is a resident of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. On September 19, 1957, the United Construction Company had a contract to provide the necessary labor and material for the installation of certain equipment in a school building in Pennsylvania. The contract to supply the equipment was signed by plaintiff, a resident of Illinois, in Decatur, Illinois, and was sent to The United…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Travelers Health Assn. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. New England Mutual Life Insurance v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Cincinnati Mutual Health Assurance Co. v. RosenthalIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reagor v. Travelers Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. Yamada Corp. v. Yasuda Fire & Marine InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. Confederation of Canada L. Ins. Co. v. Vega Y ArminanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  4. Harry Dreis, as of the Estate of Mildred T. Bishop, Deceased v. George T. Kelly, IIICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  5. Yamada Corp. v. Yasuda Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API