Legal Opinion
Robert K. Bell Enterprises, Inc. v. Consumer Product Safety Commission
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided February 15, 1980No. 79-C-40-CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
H. DALE COOK, Chief Judge.
The Court now considers plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and defendants’ Motions to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment. Affidavits and other evidence have been presented by both parties, and pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim will be merged into defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.
This is an action seeking various forms of' declaratory and injunctive relief as a result of the attempt of defendant Consumer Product Safety Commission (hereinafter “Commission”) to gather…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO, ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Roberts v. Gulf Oil Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- The State Fair of Texas, Cross-Appellee, Steck & Stapf Attractions, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. United States Consumer Product Safety Commission, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- The State Fair of Texas, Cross-Appellee, Steck & Stapf Attractions, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. United States Consumer Product Safety Commission, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981