Legal Opinion
Keith Howard, The Howard Company etc. v. Roger Murray and K&H Development etc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 8, 2015No. 1D14-1841, 1D14-1984, 1D14-1996PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBenton, J.
The final judgment before us 1 was entered in cases consolidated below, in which the trial court ruled that. development rights within the Sandestin Development of Regional Impact (DRI) run with the land: The trial court decided that “the issuance of a deed or other instrument of conveyance carries with it the ownership of a reasonable portion of intensity rights” and that “the amount of intensity allowed for a parcel must be determined based upon the individual circumstances of the development.” We conclude this approach is unworkable and reverse the . final judgment in part, on this basis..
T…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Moore v. MorrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Wyatt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc. v. CottonSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- McCurdy v. CollisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Abdo v. AbdoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Rxstrategies, Inc. v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2019
- Charles E. Hawthorne, Jr. v. Douglas S. Lyons and Marsha L. LyonsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Woodson Electric Solutions v. Port Royal PropertyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Abdo v. AbdoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.