People v. DeVine
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdward Thompson, J.
The defendant moves in coram nobis for a new trial. He contends that the recent decision in Bruton v. United States (391 U. S. 123 [May, 1968]) overruling Delli Paoli v. United States (352 U. S. 232 [1957]) requires such reversal, this for deprivation of the right of confrontation, since his codefendant’s confession inculpated the movant at a joint trial. Roberts v. Russell (392 U. S. 293 [June, 1968]) is relied upon to afford retroactivity to the Bruton holding (supra) this undergirded by Pointer v. Texas (380 U. S. 400 [1965]) which *863held that the Fourteenth Amendment (due process clause)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Roberts v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Delli Paoli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Carey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Mosby v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- State v. AikenWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- State v. HopperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.