Legal Opinion

Kent v. Monget

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1843PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Court of Probates of East Baton Rouge, Tessier, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSimon, J.

The plaintiff is appellant from a judgment of non-suit, rendered against her on the ground that she has not shown, by evidence, that she was legally authorized by her husband to institute and prosecute this suit.

The petition is in the name of “ Margaret Irwin, wife of Fredrick M. Kent, both of the parish of East Baton Rouge, said wife herein duly authorized and assisted to institute and prosecute this suit by her said husband.” It alleges that the succession of H. Longuepée, represented by the defendant as administrator thereof, is indebted to her in the sum of $850, on a promissory note…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Union Bank v. DunnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
  2. Tucker v. LisleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Streat v. Unity Industrial Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API