Legal Opinion
Springfield Airport Authority v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Ozark Air Lines, Inc. And American Airlines, Inc., Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 1, 1960No. 15853_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAHY, Circuit Judge.
The question presented is whether a hearing was required under the Federal Aviation Act to enable the Civil Aeronautics Board validly to authorize a temporary suspension of the service called for by an air carrier’s certificate. 1 The suspension order was made on the joint application of American Airlines, Inc., and Ozark Air Lines, Inc. It permits, but does not require, American temporarily to suspend service at Springfield and Peoria, Illinois, on its route between Chicago, Illinois, and St. Louis, Missouri, and it further authorizes a temporary change in the service…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Peoples Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nebraska Department of Aeronautics v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Frontier Airlines, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- W. Dalton Larue, Sr. v. Stewart L. Udall, Individually and as Secretary of the Interior, and Northamerican Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Kodiak Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Wien Consolidated Airlines, Inc., Western Air Lines, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- City of New Haven, Connecticut v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Allegheny Airlines, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Lane v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.