Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Reeves v. . Miller

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 22, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

It is unnecessary to consider the exceptions discussed in defendant’s brief, as the deed attacked by the plaintiffs in this action appears on its face to be a deed of gift, and was not registered within two years as required by C. S., 3315.

The deed was therefore void. Booth v. Hairston, 195 N. C., 8.

No error.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Booth v. . HairstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. . FergusonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Winstead v. . WoolardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Justice v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Cutts v. . McGheeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Cutts v. McGheeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API