Martin v. Barnum
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.
Appellees have filed their motion to dismiss the appeal in this cause for the reason (1) that no assignments of error were filed in the trial court, and (2) because no motion for a new trial was filed therein. The motion further states that there are no fundamental errors apparent of record, and appellants do not deny this statement, and therefore we may accept said statement as true.
The case having been tried by the court without the intervention of a jury, it was not necessary, in order to give this court jurisdiction, for a motion for a new trial to be filed. Hess & Skinner Engineering Co.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hess & Skinner Engineering Co. v. TurneyTexas Supreme Court · 1918
- Barkley v. GibbsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Van Orden v. PittsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1918
- Morrison v. NeelyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Parks v. City of WacoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lorenzen v. KeenanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- West v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927