Legal Opinion
People v. Ham
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 2, 1975No. Crim. 25523PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, P. J.
Defendant Jack Eugene Ham appeals from a judgment revoking his probation and sentencing him to prison.
Facts
In 1970, defendant was charged, in a three-count information, with possession of LSD (count I), a felony, and two misdemeanors, being under the influence of narcotics (count II) and resisting a police officer (count III).
On March 15, 1971, defendant appeared in court to plead guilty. Part of the colloquy between the prosecutor and defendant which preceded his plea was as follows:
“[Prosecutor]: Mr. Ham, as charged the violation of Section 11910 is a felony. Earlier today…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. VickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- In Re KappermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- In re GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- In Re BakkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Hilton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. ComoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- People v. JourneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.