Legal Opinion

John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Boston v. Cooper

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 22, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAY, Commissioner.

In this suit on a group insurance policy, the jury returned a verdict for the beneficiary. The principal issue in the case is whether or not the deceased had terminated his employment prior to -his death, and on this ground appellant insurance company insists it was entitled to a directed verdict.

The deceased was employed by the Dolly Madison Bakery ■ at Cincinnati, and was paid wages on an hourly basis. On May 6, 1948, he quit work and went to the home of his family in Whitley County. On June 4, he accidentally met his death'. He had •not at any time after May 6 returned…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. SweetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. BridgmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Sun Life Assur. Co. of Canada v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bensinger v. California Life Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Hanlon v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1973
  3. Koch v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API