Legal Opinion

Frank King v. Kelly Jex, Peter Lucido, and County of Macomb

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 14, 2026No. 4:25-cv-10277Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION FRANK KING, Plaintiff, Case No. 4:25-cv-10277 District Judge F. Kay Behm v. Magistrate Judge Kimberly G. Altman KELLY JEX, PETER LUCIDO, and COUNTY OF MACOMB, Defendants. _________________________________/ REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 36) AS MOOT AND TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 37) AND TO GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 38)1 I. Introduction This is a civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API