Legal Opinion

Spitzel v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 13, 1959No. 205-56PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoNes, Chief Judge

Each of the plaintiffs owns an undivided fractional interest in a tract of unimproved land containing 55.84 acres in San Luis Obispo County, California. From July 1943 until the latter part of 1946, the defendant used this tract, which is located on the seacoast, as an artillery range and bombing area in connection with amphibious training operations. This suit arises out of an alleged breach by che defendant of a contract to restore the land to the condition it was in when the defendant first took possession. The outcome of this suit depends on a determination of the date when the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Georgia Kaolin Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
  2. Eaddy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dodge Street Building Corporation, a Nebraska Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Missouri Baptist Hospital v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  3. Gila River Pimamaricopa Indian Community v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  4. Rocky River Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  5. Lambert v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API