Legal Opinion · Dissent

Claim of Eisenberg v. Erie Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 15, 1933Published

1DissentRhodes, J.

I dissent. The claimant worked substantially the whole of the year preceding his injury, but was a five-day worker. The wage *791rate should, therefore, be computed in accordance with subdivision 3 of section 14 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. (See Matter of Remmert v. Weidenmeyer, 237 App. Div. 147; affd., 262 N. Y.-.)

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Claim of Remmert v. WeidenmeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932