Legal Opinion

State v. Gordon

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 16, 2014No. 2013-KA-0495PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES F. McKAY III, Chief Judge.

hThe defendant Daniel Gordon was convicted on Counts 1 and 3 of aggravated *761rape and convicted on Count 4 of simple robbery. Finding three patent errors, but no merit to either of the defendant’s two assignments of error, the defendant’s convictions are affirmed; his sentence as to Count 1 is affirmed; his sentence as to Count 4, as a second felony habitual offender is amended to delete the restriction that it be served without the benefit of parole; the additional habitual offender sentence that defendant be treated with medroxyprogesterone acetate (“chemically…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. State v. MussallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  5. State v. HearoldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State of Louisiana v. Marcus Donte ReedSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2016
  2. State v. DaleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. State v. BrundyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. State v. FarrierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. State v. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API