Legal Opinion

Henneberry v. Henneberry

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 1958No. Civ. 17843PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Dorothy Henneberry brought this action against William Henneberry, alleging that she is the owner of an undivided one-half interest in certain real property in San Francisco, that William is wrongfully in possession of the property against her will, and demanding restitution of the property to her. By answer, William denied that plaintiff owns any interest in the property. The trial court found that plaintiff is not the owner of any interest in the property in that the deed under which she claims is void because of lack of delivery. From the judgment so declaring, plaintiff appeals.

The ease…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Kelly v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Counter v. CounterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Rousseau v. HurtadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Estate of PieperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Blackburn v. DrakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Cordasco v. ScaleroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Forbes v. VolkWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Bank of America v. FrostCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API