Legal Opinion

Arnot v. Nevins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 15, 1899PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, James Revins and others, from an •order of the Supreme Court, made at the Rew York Special Term and entered in the office of the- clerk of the county of Rew York on the 21st day of March, 1899, denying the said defendants’ motion to have certain issues settled and submitted to a jury for trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

The action was brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The plaintiff was a sub-contractor and agreed to furnish to the' contractors, for the erection of two buildings in the city of Rew York, certain cut stone required for the buildings, and to set the same. The appellants, who were the principal contractors, set up in their answer several counterclaims, whereby they sought to recover from the plaintiff upon promissory notes alleged to have been made by him and held by the appellants, and the damages claimed to have been sustained by reason of the failure of the plaintiff to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. MacKellar v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Smith v. FleischmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Herb v. Metropolitan Hospital & DispensaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. Ettlinger v. Trustees of Sailors' Snug HarborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Gersmann v. WalpoleAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913
  4. Herb v. Metropolitan Hospital & DispensaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. Furber v. Sidell, New York County Courts1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API