John Hancock Mutl. L. Ins. Co. v. Snyder
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By STEVENS, J.
The case squarely presents the question as to whether or not fraud of the insured in obtaining a policy, excepting from consideration such fraud as renders the policy void ab initio, may be utilized by the insurer as a basis for a defense, or for affirmative action seeking a cancellation of the policy, after the expiration of the contestable period.
The contestable period herein was two years from the date of issue of the policy. The insured died within that period, and action to recover upon the policy was brought by the beneficiary after the expiration of said period; no…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- American Nat. Ins. Co. v. WelshTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Henderson v. Life Ins. Co. of VirginiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Kocak v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ohio National Life Assurance Corp. v. SatterfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Gustin v. Sun Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- Ginley v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1973
- Van Gunten v. Life & Cas. Co.Lima Municipal Court · 1969
- Behrman v. Massachusetts Casualty InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.