Legal Opinion

In re Wolfson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 9, 2006Published

1Per curiam

Respondent was reciprocally suspended by this Court in June 2004 for a period of six months, effective March 20, 2004 (Matter of Wolfson, 8 AD3d 747 [2004]). He now applies for reinstatement. Petitioner advises that it does not oppose the application.

We conclude that respondent has substantially complied with the provisions of the order which suspended him and with this Court’s rules regulating the conduct of suspended attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 806.9). We are also satisfied that respondent has complied with the requirements of this Court’s rules governing reinstatement (see 22 NYCRR 806.12) and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re WolfsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API