Legal Opinion

People v. DeGina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 16, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*538The trial court did not err in refusing to permit the defendant to offer into evidence a statement made by his codefendant, as that portion of the statement which tended to exculpate the defendant was not adverse to his codefendant’s penal interest (see, People v Brensic, 70 NY2d 9, mot to amend remittitur granted 70 NY2d 722, appeal after remand 136 AD2d 169; People v Thompson, 129 AD2d 655). The trial court also did not err in permitting the officer who arrested the defendant two months after the crimes were committed to testify that when the defendant saw him he ran and hid, as the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. SatterfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. YazumNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. People v. BrensicNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. People v. SmallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ShepherdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. People v. AguirreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. People v. CarraderoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API