Legal Opinion

Davis v. Adirondack Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 19, 1970PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum : In affirming Special Term’s denial of appellants’ motion to dismiss respondent’s petition on the ground of untimeliness (CPLR 404, subd. [a]), we are not unmindful that a procedure to enforce a shareholder’s right to receive payment for her shares (Business Corporation Law, § 623) is conditioned upon the shareholder’s adherence to the time requirements of the statute (Matter of McKinney [Bush Term. Bldgs. Co.], 306 N. Y. 207; Matter of Marcus [Macy & Co.], 297 N. Y. 38, 44). The Legislature, nevertheless, recognized that equity requires…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Marcus (Macy Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Matter of McKinney (Bush Term. Bldgs. Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1954

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Greco v. Tampa Wholesale Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Schneyer v. Shenandoah Oil CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1974
  3. In Re Determination Pursuant to Chapter 31, Article 1, Sections 122 & 123 of the Code of West Virginia of 1931, Amended, of Fair Value of Shares of Bank of RipleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Carroll v. Seacroft, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API