Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ramsey v. Gould

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1871Published

Appeal from an order at Special Term.

1ConcurrenceCardozo, J.

I concur with Judge Ingraham, that the pro ceeding before Judge Barnard was only a default; and, with some hesitation, I acquiesce in the conclusion to declare the order made by Judge Brady not to be appealable. While I do not differ from the opinion that the action of the Special Term, in opening a default, is generally not appealable, I am not willing, by my silence, to seem to assent or agree to the proposition that it is never so. If there is a palpable abuse of discretion, the order made may be reviewable. This has been frequently held, even when the question arose in respect to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Plato v. KellyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1863

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API