Legal Opinion
Nezlsky v. Auble
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 22, 1936No. 140PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By STEVENS, J.
It is the opinion of this court that the law upon this subject has been so clearly announced by the Supreme Court of this state as to remove any question concerning the same. In Weiher, etc. v Phillips, 103 Oh St 249, syllabus 1, the Supreme Court said the following:
“1. A board of county commissioners is not liable In its official capacity for damages for negligent discharge of its official duties except in so far as such liability is created by statute, and such liability shall not be extended beyond the clear import of the terms of the statutes.”
In the opinion in said…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Western Pennsylvania Natl. Bank v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- Western Pennsylvania National Bank v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- Sheley v. Swing, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1938