Legal Opinion

Frigidice Co. v. Southeastern Fair Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 10, 1938No. 27150PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

The petitioner, while alleging generally that it had a permit from the Southeastern Fair Association to deliver ice to the Teeny Weeny stores within the fair grounds, and that it has been damaged by the breach of that permit and the alleged conspiracy or effort on the part of the defendants to disrupt and ruin its business, fails by its specific allegations to show that its rights have been in any way encroached upon. The exhibit attached to the petition, which the plaintiff refers to as a permit, is entirely lacking in the respect claimed, and is the only evidence relied on to sustain such…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Woodruff v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Palmer v. Atlantic Ice & Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. Atlanta Terminal Co. v. American Baggage & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  5. Harford Agricultural & Breeders Ass'n v. SomervilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gainesville Glass Co. v. Don Hammond, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Hughes v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  3. Drummond v. McKinleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API