United States v. Pirouz Sedaghaty
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge McKEOWN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge TALLMAN.
OPINION
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
This is a tax fraud case that was transformed into a trial on terrorism. The case stems from charges that Pirouz Sedaghaty (known as Pete Seda) falsified a 2000 charitable organization tax return in order to conceal his support of an independence movement in Chechnya, a republic in the Caucasus mountains of southern Russia. Seda founded the U.S. branch of the Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc. (“Al-Haramain”), a Saudi Arabian charity that the U.S. government suspected of funding…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. RaymondaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Reynaldo Ayala v. Kevin ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Richard RenziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Stephen Comstock v. Stefanie HumphriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. MuhtorovCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.