Legal Opinion

United States v. Pirouz Sedaghaty

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 23, 2013No. 11-30342PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge McKEOWN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge TALLMAN.

OPINION

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

This is a tax fraud case that was transformed into a trial on terrorism. The case stems from charges that Pirouz Sedaghaty (known as Pete Seda) falsified a 2000 charitable organization tax return in order to conceal his support of an independence movement in Chechnya, a republic in the Caucasus mountains of southern Russia. Seda founded the U.S. branch of the Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc. (“Al-Haramain”), a Saudi Arabian charity that the U.S. government suspected of funding…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. RaymondaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  2. Reynaldo Ayala v. Kevin ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Richard RenziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Stephen Comstock v. Stefanie HumphriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. MuhtorovCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API