In Re Establishment of Judicial Ditch No. 75

In an application for a reargument, the relator urges: First, that the number of petitioners required should be determined by taking into account all lands affected by or assessed for the construction of the ditch, and not merely the lands through which the ditch passes; and second, that it conclusively appears that large areas of benefited land are omitted from the assessment. He cites State ex rel. Greibrock v. Grindeland, 143 Minn. 435,174 N.W. 312, in support of his first claim.

Under the early drainage laws any person whose land was "liable to be affected by or assessed for" the…