Legal Opinion

Mayer v. C. H. Mitchell & Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 3, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Assumpsit.—Common counts. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Nathaniel C. Sears, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1895.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary

The appellee sued for the price of a freight elevator put into a building under a contract with the appellant. The contract price was $560 and the elevator was to be complete several days before it ivas so in fact.

The appellant allowed to his tenant a deduction of $125 ■from the rent because of this delay.

The declaration was the common counts in assumpsit, which was appropriate. Taylor v. Renn, 79 Ill. 181; Lucas v. Googwinn, 4 Scott 502; S. C., 3 Bing. N. C. 737; 32 E. C. L. 340; Fowler v. Deakman, 84 Ill. 130; Gottschalk v. Smith, 54 Ill. App. 341.

Damages for delay could be recouped under…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fowler v. DeakmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Priestly v. Northern Indiana & Chicago RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Cooke v. PrebleIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Taylor v. RennIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Gottschalk v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Trust & Savings Bank v. Hermosa Land & Cattle Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Shepard v. MillsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
  3. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. WillsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API