Legal Opinion

Young v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1978No. Appeal, No. 2007 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

In this case the only issue raised and argued by Loretta Young (Claimant) is whether the referee erred by refusing to admit as evidence in Claimant’s claim for compensation a certificate by a qualified physician.

Section 4221 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §§834, 835, provides in pertinent part:

Where any claim for compensation at issue before a referee involves 25 weeks or less of disability . . . the employee . . . may submit a certificate by any qualified physician as to the history,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fazio v. Pittsburgh Railways CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rivera v. Philadelphia Theological Seminary of St. Charles Borromeo, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. OstroskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Sohmer v. SohmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Burris v. State Employes' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Purex Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API