Legal Opinion

School City v. Heinzman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 1895No. 1,503PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Erom the Tipton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The appellees sued and recovered judgment against the appellant for a balance alleged to be due. them upon a contract for the building of a schoolhouse in the city of Noblesville, Indiana.

Two specifications of error have been assigned by appellant, as follows:

“ 1. The court below erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.”
“2. The court erred in ’overruling the demurrer to the second paragraph of the answer to appellant’s cross-complaint. ”

These specifications of error will be taken up and considered in the inverse order of their assignment.

The cross-complaint filed by appellant declared…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eckert v. BinkleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Firestone v. WernerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Wade v. HuberIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Angaletos v. Meridian National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grider v. ScharfIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Wright v. J. R. Watkins Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Ginther v. Rochester Improvement Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API