School City v. Heinzman
Indiana Court of Appeals
Erom the Tipton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The appellees sued and recovered judgment against the appellant for a balance alleged to be due. them upon a contract for the building of a schoolhouse in the city of Noblesville, Indiana.
Two specifications of error have been assigned by appellant, as follows:
“ 1. The court below erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.”
“2. The court erred in ’overruling the demurrer to the second paragraph of the answer to appellant’s cross-complaint. ”
These specifications of error will be taken up and considered in the inverse order of their assignment.
The cross-complaint filed by appellant declared…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Eckert v. BinkleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Firestone v. WernerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- Wade v. HuberIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Angaletos v. Meridian National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grider v. ScharfIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
- Wright v. J. R. Watkins Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1928
- Ginther v. Rochester Improvement Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1910