Legal Opinion

Dyer v. Lowe

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1947No. 36346PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

On April 17, 1937, appellee was duly appointed receiver for Arthur Delapierre, Inc. After notice to creditors to file claims, Charles H. Cowen filed claim in the sum of $73,474.08, representing certain promissory notes executed by the corporation and unpaid salary. This claim was duly assigned to appellant.

The chancellor disallowed this claim as being barred by the statute of limitations. It is true that the notes and salary claim are so barred if we look only to the dates of the notes and the periods at which the salary items accrued. However, on February 28, 1934, a contract was entered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hart v. BoytMississippi Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Orgill Bros. & Co. v. EverettMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Beasley v. EvansMississippi Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Taylor v. De Soto Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Stewart v. FormanMississippi Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harrison Enterprises, Inc. v. Trilogy Communications, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Harrison Enterprises, Inc. v. Trilogy Communications, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API