Legal Opinion

Van Dusan v. Van Dusan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1893PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Macomb. (Canfield, J.) Bill for divorce. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

The complainant sues for divorce upon the ground of cruelty. She alleges her marriage to defendant to have occurred on or about January 14, 1879, at the city of Detroit. The defendant’s answer denies both marriage and cruelty.

The evidence clearly shows that no marriage ceremony was ever performed, at Detroit or elsewhere. According to complainant’s testimony, she was persuaded to leave New York, where she resided, and come west with defendant, with whom she has consorted since. She claims to have refused several times before yielding to his importunities to go west with him, upon the ground…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rose v. RoseMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bechtel v. BartonMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  2. In re Fitzgibbons' EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Barker v. ValentineMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Brown v. Long Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Brodock v. BrodockMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API